NSABP Members' Area
Password Protected - Access
Limited to NSABP Participating
Institutions Only
NSABP Foundation, Inc.
General NSABP Information
Contact the NSABP
Pathology Section
Future Meetings
NSABP Newsletters
Media Info on cMYC Study
Media Info on STAR
Employment
Clinical Trials Information
Clinical Trials Overview
Protocol Chart
Never Say Lost
Treatment Trials Information
Protocol B-36
Protocol B-37
Protocol B-39
Protocol B-40
Protocol B-41
Protocol B-42
Protocol C-10
Protocol R-04
Prevention Trials Information
Protocol P-1 - BCPT
Protocol P-2 - STAR
BreastCancerPrevention.com
Bibliography of Publications
Related Web Sites
About the NSABP Web Site
Helper Applications
Links to Major Search Engines
Medical Search Engines
To report problems, ask
questions or make comments,
please send e-mail to:
Webmaster@nsabp.pitt.edu
Oral Uracil and Tegafur Plus Leucovorin Compared with Intravenous Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in Stage II and III Carcinoma of the Colon: Results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol C-06.
Lembersky BC, Wieand HS, Petrelli NJ, O’Connell MJ, Colangelo LH, Smith RE, Seay TE, Giguere JK, Marshall ME, Jacobs AD, Colman LK, Soran A, Yothers G, Wolmark N
J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(13):2059-64.
Abstract
Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to compare the relative efficacy of oral uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) with the efficacy of weekly intravenous fluorouracil (FU) plus LV in prolonging disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after primary surgery for colon carcinoma.
Patients and Methods: Between February 1997 and March 1999, 1,608 patients with stage II and III carcinoma of the colon were randomly assigned to receive either oral UFT+LV or intravenous FU+LV.
Results: Of the total patients, 47% had stage II colon cancer, and 53% had stage III colon cancer. Median follow-up time was 62.3 months. The estimated hazard ratio (HR) for OS of patients who received UFT+LV versus that of patients who received FU+LV was 1.014 (95% CI, 0.825 to 1.246). The estimated HR for DFS was 1.004 (95% CI, 0.847 to 1.190). Cox proportional hazards model analyses with regard to age (< 60 v > or = 60 years), stage, or number of involved nodes (none v one to three v > or = four nodes) revealed no interaction with OS or DFS. Toxicity was similar in the two groups. In the UFT+LV arm, 38.2% of patients experienced any grade 3 or 4 toxic event compared with 37.8% of patients in the FU+LV arm. Primary quality-of-life end points did not differ between the two regimens, although convenience of care analysis favored UFT+LV.
Conclusion: UFT+LV achieved similar DFS and OS when compared with an intravenous, weekly, bolus FU+LV regimen. The two regimens were equitoxic and generally well tolerated.