NSABP Members' Area
  Password Protected - Access
  Limited to NSABP Participating
  Institutions Only


NSABP Foundation, Inc.



General NSABP Information
  Financial Conflicts of
     Interest Policy
  Coalition Comment:
     Reconfiguration
  IOM Report Group Comment
  Contact the NSABP
  Pathology Section
  Future Meetings
  NSABP Newsletters
  Media Info on STAR
  Employment

Clinical Trials Information
  Clinical Trials Overview
  Protocol Chart
  Never Say Lost

Treatment Trials Information
  Protocol B-43
  Protocol B-47
  Protocol B-51

Prevention Trials Information
  Protocol P-1 - BCPT
  Protocol P-2 - STAR
  Protocol P-5
  BreastCancerPrevention.com

Scientific Publications

Related Web Sites



Medical Search Engines



To report problems, ask
questions or make comments,
please send e-mail to:
Webmaster@nsabp.pitt.edu

Annotated Bibliography of NSABP Publications


Endogenous Sex Hormones, Breast Cancer Risk, and Tamoxifen Response: An Ancillary Study in the NSABP Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (P-1).
Beattie MS, Costantino JP, Cummings SR, Wickerham DL, Vogel VG, Dowsett M, Folkerd EJ, Willett WC, Wolmark N, Hankinson SE.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jan 18;98(2):110-5.

Abstract
Background: Prospective studies have shown an association between increased serum levels of estradiol and testosterone and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Raloxifene has been shown to reduce breast cancer risk more in women with high estradiol levels than in those with lower levels. The purpose of this study was to determine whether sex hormone levels were associated with breast cancer risk and with response to tamoxifen in a high-risk population.

Methods: Using a case-cohort design, we studied 135 women with postmenopausal breast cancer and 275 postmenopausal women without breast cancer who were enrolled in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Cancer Prevention Trial (P-1) and who had been treated with tamoxifen or placebo for 69 months. We measured estradiol, testosterone, and sex hormone-binding globulin by using radioimmunoassay in baseline plasma samples. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for invasive breast cancer were estimated for each quartile of sex hormone level using Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Median plasma levels of estradiol, testosterone, and sex hormone-binding globulin were similar between the case and cohort groups. The relative risk of breast cancer for women in the placebo group was not associated with sex hormone levels (risk of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in women by quartile of estradiol: Q1 [lowest], RR = 1.0; Q2, RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.49 to 2.7; Q3, RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.45 to 2.61; and Q4, RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.59 to 2.82). The reduced risk of invasive breast cancer in tamoxifen-treated women compared with placebo-treated women was not associated with sex hormone levels.

Conclusions: These data do not support the use of endogenous sex hormone levels to identify women who are at particularly high risk of breast cancer and who are most likely to benefit from chemoprevention with tamoxifen.


PMID: 16418513